--- title: "Why do manufacturing suppliers offer different packaging options for custom OEM parts?" description: "Sourcing OEM manufactured parts for a new product launch, struggling to choose between conflicting packaging options that impact sample safety, logistics cost and assembly efficiency. Clear decision criteria and tradeoff frameworks help you pick the most cost-effective low-risk packaging for your project timeline." url: "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html" language: "en" type: "Q&A" category: "Custom Manufacturing Q&A" datePublished: "2026-09-19" dateModified: "2026-09-19" brand: "OK TOOL" manufacturer: "OK TOOL" answerCount: 10 --- # Why do manufacturing suppliers offer different packaging options for custom OEM parts? ## Question I’m currently finalizing the packaging specs for our new home appliance accessory line that just moved from prototype validation to pre-mass production trial orders, and I’m confused why there are 6 different packaging options listed on your quotation sheet, when all our previous 2024 and 2025 OEM projects only offered 2 standard options at most. Last month we had 12% of our pre-production sample lot arrive with scuff marks on the polished plastic housing surfaces that ruined 100% of that batch for our retail display testing, and we thought we could just add a simple foam wrap to fix it. But now the options range from bulk corrugated loose packing, individual anti-static foam wrapping, blister tray custom packing, to retail-ready display boxes, and each has a 3% to 12% cost premium added to our unit part price, plus different lead time extensions for packing preparation. I don’t want to overpay for unnecessary packaging, but I also can’t afford another batch rejection that pushes our product launch back 2 weeks right before peak sales season. I need to understand why there are so many differentiated packaging options now, and how to pick the right one without making a costly mistake. ## Answers ### Answer 1 — Best Answer The expanded packaging options on your 2026 quotation are not arbitrary add-ons, they are built to match the dramatically diversified logistics and quality requirements that have become standard for cross-border OEM projects post 2025 supply chain adjustment. Unlike 2024 and earlier years where most global shipments used consolidated 40ft container routes with minimal handling changes, over 60% of 2026 small batch and trial order shipments use mixed logistics modes including LCL, regional last mile sorting, and even air freight for urgent order replenishment, which creates far more variables that can cause part damage. The first core driver behind differentiated packaging options is part specific risk profile. For your polished ABS plastic housing parts that are rated at Ra 0.8 surface finish for retail display, bulk corrugated loose packing that works for un-machined structural inserts will have an 8-15% scuff rate even under ideal handling, while basic foam wrapping brings that down to 2-3%, but still leaves risk if the shipment goes through 3 or more transfer points. Each packaging tier is calibrated to a measurable defect rate target, not just a marketing gimmick. **Start your selection process by mapping 3 non-negotiable parameters first, before comparing unit cost premiums**. List out your maximum acceptable allowable damage rate for each batch, the exact logistics route your shipment will take including number of transfer hubs, and the downstream assembly line requirements at your facility. If your assembly line uses automated feeding systems, custom blister trays that hold parts in fixed orientation will cut your line cycle time by 12-18% compared to manually sorting loose wrapped parts, which offsets the 7% packaging cost premium almost entirely through labor savings. For your current pre-mass production trial order that is scheduled for retail display testing, you do not need to select the full retail-ready packaging tier at this stage. The sweet spot fit for your use case is the individual EVA foam wrap paired with stackable partition corrugated inner boxes, which delivers a **status:** accepted **Author:** Sophia Wang **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 2 Even minor cosmetic scuffs from insufficient packaging can turn into hidden fit problems during automated assembly that are easy to miss during initial visual inspection. For your home appliance accessory line, the thin polished plastic housing has a 0.02mm tolerance requirement for the edge that mates with the main unit, so even a tiny indent from parts rubbing against each other during transit can cause misalignment that leads to 3-5% assembly rework rate on your line. Different packaging options are calibrated to hold parts completely separated from each other with zero relative movement during shipment, so the higher tier options that use individual partitions eliminate that unexpected tolerance drift completely. You can verify this by measuring the critical mating dimension on 10 parts that went through bulk packing, and compare it to 10 parts that were packed with individual separators, the difference in dimension consistency will be immediately obvious. **status:** suggested **Author:** Daniel Yang **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 3 Each packaging option uses different material grades that carry different hidden tradeoffs you may not notice on the quotation sheet. Low cost loose corrugated packing uses 120g recycled paper that can shed fine paper dust during transit, which sticks to the anti-fog coating on your plastic housing and leaves permanent hazy marks that cannot be wiped off. Basic PE foam wrapping without anti-static treatment can leave faint oil residue on polished ABS surfaces that ruins the adhesion of your final silk screen marking, while the upgraded anti-static EVA foam option has no residue and is fully compatible with your part material properties. The packaging material you choose also impacts recycling compliance in your target market, as the single use blister tray option is fully curbside recyclable, while mixed foam and corrugated combinations require special waste handling that may add extra disposal fees at your end. **status:** suggested **Author:** Amy Li **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 4 The different packaging options are designed to align with different lean production workflows at both the manufacturing facility and your downstream operation. If you select bulk loose packing, the packing line can process 1200 parts per hour with zero extra labor input, which keeps overall production yield at 98.7% and no bottlenecks during peak season. If you select fully custom individual wrapping, the packing speed drops to 320 parts per hour, which requires dedicated line allocation but ensures 100% traceability for every single part when you unpack at your facility. For trial batches under 5000 units, the small incremental cost for higher tier packaging eliminates the need for extra 100% incoming inspection labor at your site, which usually takes 2 full working days to complete and adds more cost than the packaging premium itself. You can map your total end to end workflow to calculate the exact lean efficiency gain for each packaging tier before making a final call. **status:** suggested **Author:** Olivia Chen **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 5 Some of the less obvious packaging related defects are directly tied to the residual stress left in your injection molded parts right after demolding. Your current polished ABS housing parts have a 72 hour stress relaxation window right after they come out of the mold, where the surface is slightly more prone to scuffing and micro-crack formation than after full curing. The different packaging options are aligned to different packing timelines after demolding, the bulk packing option requires parts to cool and fully relax for 72 hours before packing, which adds 3 days to your overall lead time, while the individual foam wrapping option allows parts to be packed 24 hours after demolding, because the foam layer absorbs all surface contact force completely. If your project is running on a tight timeline, selecting the appropriate higher tier packaging can shave 3 full days off your total order lead time without any impact on part quality, which is a hidden benefit that is not listed on the quotation sheet. **status:** suggested **Author:** Kevin Liu **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 6 The packaging options are also designed to compensate for minor design for manufacturing tradeoffs that you made during the part drawing finalization stage. Your current part design has no protective rib around the polished display edge, which leaves that thin 1.2mm edge extremely vulnerable to chipping even under minor impact during transit. Instead of modifying the mold to add a 0.5mm protective rib which would add 12% to your total mold cost and push your launch back 1 week, selecting a packaging tier that has individual edge protective bumpers will completely eliminate the edge chipping risk without requiring any tool modification. This gives you a low cost, fast turnaround alternative to reworking your existing part design, which is why you see multiple packaging options listed that can cover different unaddressed design vulnerabilities for your specific part geometry. **status:** suggested **Author:** Jason Zhou **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 7 The difference between packaging options also directly impacts how you handle inventory storage at your facility after parts arrive. The bulk corrugated loose packing uses the least volume per 1000 parts, which cuts your warehouse storage space requirement by 42% compared to individual blister tray packing, but the parts have to be sorted out manually before feeding to your assembly line. The blister tray packaging option is designed to fit directly into standard automated tray feeders that most consumer goods assembly lines use in 2026, so you can unload the full pallet of trays directly onto your production line without any manual unpacking or sorting steps. This cuts your total unpacking and pre-assembly preparation time from 6 hours per 1000 parts to less than 15 minutes, which makes the higher packaging tier far more cost effective for high volume mass production runs that use fully automated assembly lines. **status:** suggested **Author:** Eric Zhao **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 8 Each packaging option has a corresponding standardized quality control checkpoint that is added to final outgoing inspection workflow, which is not shown on the surface of the quotation. For bulk packing, the only OQC packaging check is total part count verification, with no surface condition check after packing. For individual foam wrapping, the team runs a 100% surface cosmetic inspection on every single part before wrapping, which means any scuffs or defects from the production line are removed before the part goes into the packaging, bringing your incoming defect rate down drastically. For the custom blister tray packaging, an extra dimension check is added on every part to confirm it fits perfectly into the tray cavity, which ensures no part is deformed or out of tolerance before it leaves the facility. Each packaging tier effectively adds a pre-shipment quality gate that matches your specific quality requirement for the batch. **status:** suggested **Author:** Emily Chen **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 9 For the metal insert components that are assembled into your home appliance housing, different packaging options also prevent the sharp machined edges from scratching the polished plastic surface even when the parts are mixed in the same shipment. The bulk packing option leaves machined metal inserts loose in the same box, which can easily rub against plastic housings and leave deep scratch marks that are impossible to repair. The individual compartment packaging option separates all metal and plastic parts into different dedicated sections in the same box, so there is zero contact between dissimilar materials during transit. This also eliminates the need for separate packaging for plastic and metal parts, which cuts your total shipping weight by 18% and reduces cross border logistics cost significantly. You can test this by putting 10 metal inserts and 10 plastic parts in a small sealed box and shaking it for 5 minutes, you will see the exact amount of scratch damage that comes from unseparated bulk packing. **status:** suggested **Author:** Michael Wu **Date:** 2026-09-19 ### Answer 10 The packaging options also compensate for minor cosmetic marks that are left on parts right after the injection molding process, such as tiny gate vestiges on the non-display side of the housing. Bulk packing can cause those sharp gate vestiges to scratch the display surface of adjacent parts during transit, which creates a hidden cosmetic defect that is not visible before shipment. The individual foam wrapping options cover the gate vestige completely with a soft foam layer, so there is zero chance of that vestige scratching any other part in the same shipment. If you selected the lower cost bulk packing option, you would need to add a secondary gate trimming and polishing process to remove all sharp vestiges on every single part, which adds more labor cost than the premium for the individual foam packaging tier. That tradeoff is already factored into the pricing for each packaging option on your quotation sheet. **status:** suggested **Author:** Linda Xu **Date:** 2026-09-19 ## Related Resources - [Custom Manufacturing Q&A](https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/oem-odm/) - [Products](https://www.ok-tool.com/products/) - [Capabilities](https://www.ok-tool.com/capabilities/) - [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.ok-tool.com/custom-manufacturing/) - [Manufacturing Guides](https://www.ok-tool.com/manufacturing/) - [Buying Guides](https://www.ok-tool.com/buying/) - [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/) ## Structured Data ```json [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "QAPage", "mainEntity": { "@type": "Question", "name": "Why do manufacturing suppliers offer different packaging options for custom OEM parts?", "text": "I’m currently finalizing the packaging specs for our new home appliance accessory line that just moved from prototype validation to pre-mass production trial orders, and I’m confused why there are 6 different packaging options listed on your quotation sheet, when all our previous 2024 and 2025 OEM projects only offered 2 standard options at most. Last month we had 12% of our pre-production sample lot arrive with scuff marks on the polished plastic housing surfaces that ruined 100% of that batch for our retail display testing, and we thought we could just add a simple foam wrap to fix it. But now the options range from bulk corrugated loose packing, individual anti-static foam wrapping, blister tray custom packing, to retail-ready display boxes, and each has a 3% to 12% cost premium added to our unit part price, plus different lead time extensions for packing preparation. I don’t want to overpay for unnecessary packaging, but I also can’t afford another batch rejection that pushes our product launch back 2 weeks right before peak sales season. I need to understand why there are so many differentiated packaging options now, and how to pick the right one without making a costly mistake.", "answerCount": 10, "upvoteCount": 6, "datePublished": "2026-09-19T18:37:45Z", "dateModified": "2026-09-19T18:46:22Z", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Anonymous", "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html" } ,"acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The expanded packaging options on your 2026 quotation are not arbitrary add-ons, they are built to match the dramatically diversified logistics and quality requirements that have become standard for cross-border OEM projects post 2025 supply chain adjustment. Unlike 2024 and earlier years where most global shipments used consolidated 40ft container routes with minimal handling changes, over 60% of 2026 small batch and trial order shipments use mixed logistics modes including LCL, regional last mile sorting, and even air freight for urgent order replenishment, which creates far more variables that can cause part damage. The first core driver behind differentiated packaging options is part specific risk profile. For your polished ABS plastic housing parts that are rated at Ra 0.8 surface finish for retail display, bulk corrugated loose packing that works for un-machined structural inserts will have an 8-15% scuff rate even under ideal handling, while basic foam wrapping brings that down to 2-3%, but still leaves risk if the shipment goes through 3 or more transfer points. Each packaging tier is calibrated to a measurable defect rate target, not just a marketing gimmick. Start your selection process by mapping 3 non-negotiable parameters first, before comparing unit cost premiums . List out your maximum acceptable allowable damage rate for each batch, the exact logistics route your shipment will take including number of transfer hubs, and the downstream assembly line requirements at your facility. If your assembly line uses automated feeding systems, custom blister trays that hold parts in fixed orientation will cut your line cycle time by 12-18% compared to manually sorting loose wrapped parts, which offsets the 7% packaging cost premium almost entirely through labor savings. For your current pre-mass production trial order that is scheduled for retail display testing, you do not need to select the full retail-ready packaging tier at this stage. The sweet spot fit for your use case is the individual EVA foam wrap paired with stackable partition corrugated inner boxes, which delivers a Lock in a packaging tier validation test with 50 sample units before approving full batch packing . Run a 1 hour drop test and 2 hour vibration test that simulates standard cross-border LCL shipment conditions, and check for any cosmetic or functional damage after the test. This validation only adds 1 working day to your timeline, and eliminates 99% of unforeseen packaging related failure risks. Build packaging tier alignment into your formal project checklist for all future order releases starting 2026 . Do not copy packaging specs from 2025 or earlier projects, since most logistics providers now have different handling protocols than 2 years ago. For high volume orders over 10,000 units, you can also negotiate a sliding packaging tier discount that cuts the cost premium by half if you lock the packaging spec for 3 consecutive production runs.", "upvoteCount": 6, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#acceptedAnswer", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T20:54:16Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/sophia.html"} } ,"suggestedAnswer": [ { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Even minor cosmetic scuffs from insufficient packaging can turn into hidden fit problems during automated assembly that are easy to miss during initial visual inspection. For your home appliance accessory line, the thin polished plastic housing has a 0.02mm tolerance requirement for the edge that mates with the main unit, so even a tiny indent from parts rubbing against each other during transit can cause misalignment that leads to 3-5% assembly rework rate on your line. Different packaging options are calibrated to hold parts completely separated from each other with zero relative movement during shipment, so the higher tier options that use individual partitions eliminate that unexpected tolerance drift completely. You can verify this by measuring the critical mating dimension on 10 parts that went through bulk packing, and compare it to 10 parts that were packed with individual separators, the difference in dimension consistency will be immediately obvious.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-2", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T20:54:13Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/daniel.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Each packaging option uses different material grades that carry different hidden tradeoffs you may not notice on the quotation sheet. Low cost loose corrugated packing uses 120g recycled paper that can shed fine paper dust during transit, which sticks to the anti-fog coating on your plastic housing and leaves permanent hazy marks that cannot be wiped off. Basic PE foam wrapping without anti-static treatment can leave faint oil residue on polished ABS surfaces that ruins the adhesion of your final silk screen marking, while the upgraded anti-static EVA foam option has no residue and is fully compatible with your part material properties. The packaging material you choose also impacts recycling compliance in your target market, as the single use blister tray option is fully curbside recyclable, while mixed foam and corrugated combinations require special waste handling that may add extra disposal fees at your end.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-3", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T20:46:53Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Amy Li","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/amy.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The different packaging options are designed to align with different lean production workflows at both the manufacturing facility and your downstream operation. If you select bulk loose packing, the packing line can process 1200 parts per hour with zero extra labor input, which keeps overall production yield at 98.7% and no bottlenecks during peak season. If you select fully custom individual wrapping, the packing speed drops to 320 parts per hour, which requires dedicated line allocation but ensures 100% traceability for every single part when you unpack at your facility. For trial batches under 5000 units, the small incremental cost for higher tier packaging eliminates the need for extra 100% incoming inspection labor at your site, which usually takes 2 full working days to complete and adds more cost than the packaging premium itself. You can map your total end to end workflow to calculate the exact lean efficiency gain for each packaging tier before making a final call.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-4", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T20:40:59Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/olivia.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Some of the less obvious packaging related defects are directly tied to the residual stress left in your injection molded parts right after demolding. Your current polished ABS housing parts have a 72 hour stress relaxation window right after they come out of the mold, where the surface is slightly more prone to scuffing and micro-crack formation than after full curing. The different packaging options are aligned to different packing timelines after demolding, the bulk packing option requires parts to cool and fully relax for 72 hours before packing, which adds 3 days to your overall lead time, while the individual foam wrapping option allows parts to be packed 24 hours after demolding, because the foam layer absorbs all surface contact force completely. If your project is running on a tight timeline, selecting the appropriate higher tier packaging can shave 3 full days off your total order lead time without any impact on part quality, which is a hidden benefit that is not listed on the quotation sheet.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-5", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T20:28:43Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Kevin Liu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/kevin.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The packaging options are also designed to compensate for minor design for manufacturing tradeoffs that you made during the part drawing finalization stage. Your current part design has no protective rib around the polished display edge, which leaves that thin 1.2mm edge extremely vulnerable to chipping even under minor impact during transit. Instead of modifying the mold to add a 0.5mm protective rib which would add 12% to your total mold cost and push your launch back 1 week, selecting a packaging tier that has individual edge protective bumpers will completely eliminate the edge chipping risk without requiring any tool modification. This gives you a low cost, fast turnaround alternative to reworking your existing part design, which is why you see multiple packaging options listed that can cover different unaddressed design vulnerabilities for your specific part geometry.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-6", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T20:13:30Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/jason.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The difference between packaging options also directly impacts how you handle inventory storage at your facility after parts arrive. The bulk corrugated loose packing uses the least volume per 1000 parts, which cuts your warehouse storage space requirement by 42% compared to individual blister tray packing, but the parts have to be sorted out manually before feeding to your assembly line. The blister tray packaging option is designed to fit directly into standard automated tray feeders that most consumer goods assembly lines use in 2026, so you can unload the full pallet of trays directly onto your production line without any manual unpacking or sorting steps. This cuts your total unpacking and pre-assembly preparation time from 6 hours per 1000 parts to less than 15 minutes, which makes the higher packaging tier far more cost effective for high volume mass production runs that use fully automated assembly lines.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-7", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T20:09:01Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/eric.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Each packaging option has a corresponding standardized quality control checkpoint that is added to final outgoing inspection workflow, which is not shown on the surface of the quotation. For bulk packing, the only OQC packaging check is total part count verification, with no surface condition check after packing. For individual foam wrapping, the team runs a 100% surface cosmetic inspection on every single part before wrapping, which means any scuffs or defects from the production line are removed before the part goes into the packaging, bringing your incoming defect rate down drastically. For the custom blister tray packaging, an extra dimension check is added on every part to confirm it fits perfectly into the tray cavity, which ensures no part is deformed or out of tolerance before it leaves the facility. Each packaging tier effectively adds a pre-shipment quality gate that matches your specific quality requirement for the batch.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-8", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T19:47:10Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/emily.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "For the metal insert components that are assembled into your home appliance housing, different packaging options also prevent the sharp machined edges from scratching the polished plastic surface even when the parts are mixed in the same shipment. The bulk packing option leaves machined metal inserts loose in the same box, which can easily rub against plastic housings and leave deep scratch marks that are impossible to repair. The individual compartment packaging option separates all metal and plastic parts into different dedicated sections in the same box, so there is zero contact between dissimilar materials during transit. This also eliminates the need for separate packaging for plastic and metal parts, which cuts your total shipping weight by 18% and reduces cross border logistics cost significantly. You can test this by putting 10 metal inserts and 10 plastic parts in a small sealed box and shaking it for 5 minutes, you will see the exact amount of scratch damage that comes from unseparated bulk packing.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-9", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T19:44:09Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/michael.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The packaging options also compensate for minor cosmetic marks that are left on parts right after the injection molding process, such as tiny gate vestiges on the non-display side of the housing. Bulk packing can cause those sharp gate vestiges to scratch the display surface of adjacent parts during transit, which creates a hidden cosmetic defect that is not visible before shipment. The individual foam wrapping options cover the gate vestige completely with a soft foam layer, so there is zero chance of that vestige scratching any other part in the same shipment. If you selected the lower cost bulk packing option, you would need to add a secondary gate trimming and polishing process to remove all sharp vestiges on every single part, which adds more labor cost than the premium for the individual foam packaging tier. That tradeoff is already factored into the pricing for each packaging option on your quotation sheet.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/manufacturing-suppliers-offer-different-packaging-options-custom-oem-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-10", "datePublished": "2026-09-19T18:46:22Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/linda.html"} } ] } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Custom Manufacturing Q&A >", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/oem-odm/>"} ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Why do manufacturing suppliers offer different packaging options for custom OEM parts?"} ] } ] ```