---
title: "What Key Quality Control Points Matter for Injection Molding Metal Tool Parts in Electrical Equipment?"
description: "When comparing suppliers for mold procurement of injection molded metal tool parts for electrical equipment, navigate dilemmas in quality consistency, cost efficiency, and long-term reliability by evaluating mold structure, material selection, process control, and DFM capabilities to ensure compliance with UL94 flame retardancy, reduce defects, and lower maintenance costs."
url: "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Injection Molding Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-01"
dateModified: "2026-10-01"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 9
---

# What Key Quality Control Points Matter for Injection Molding Metal Tool Parts in Electrical Equipment?

## Question

 As a supply chain manager responsible for mold procurement, I’m currently evaluating three suppliers for our new line of insulated screwdriver handles—overmolded steel shaft tool parts for electrical equipment—targeting 100,000 units annually. Each supplier has distinct proposals: Supplier A offers a low-cost aluminum mold with a single side gate, quoting a 3-week lead time but no long-term maintenance plan. Supplier B proposes a hardened steel mold with a multi-gate design, citing better dimensional stability but a 6-week lead time and 30% higher upfront cost. Supplier C’s mid-priced option uses modular steel inserts with a sub-gate, claiming easier maintenance but unproven performance with our UL94 V-0 flame-retardant resin. Past projects have suffered from mold wear causing ±0.1mm dimensional drift at the grip-shaft interface, leading to assembly jams, and flash that required post-processing. I need clear criteria to compare these options, balancing upfront cost, long-term reliability, defect rates, and compliance with our electrical equipment’s insulation and dimensional requirements. 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

The core differences between the three supplier proposals lie in mold material durability, gate design efficiency, and maintenance flexibility. Supplier A’s aluminum mold offers low upfront cost and fast lead times but lacks the hardness needed for high-volume production with abrasive flame-retardant resins—aluminum wears 3-5 times faster than hardened steel, leading to dimensional drift and flash within 50,000 cycles. The single side gate also increases the risk of warpage in the thick insulation grip, as the resin cools unevenly around the steel shaft. Supplier B’s hardened steel mold addresses wear issues, with a projected mold life of 500,000+ cycles, and its multi-gate design distributes resin flow evenly, minimizing warpage and ensuring consistent insulation thickness. However, the higher upfront cost and longer lead time require a longer production horizon to justify. Supplier C’s modular steel inserts balance durability and maintenance: individual gate or cavity inserts can be replaced without rebuilding the entire mold, reducing downtime, but the unproven performance with your UL94 V-0 resin introduces risk of adhesion issues or material degradation.

Each option aligns with specific production scenarios. Supplier A is suitable for short-run, low-volume projects (under 30,000 units) where cost and speed are priorities, but it will require frequent mold rework for your 100,000-unit annual target. Supplier B’s hardened steel mold is ideal for multi-year, high-volume production, as its long life reduces total cost of ownership over time and ensures consistent compliance with dimensional and insulation requirements. Supplier C’s modular design works best if you anticipate frequent design tweaks or need to adjust gate locations post-launch, but you’ll need to validate resin compatibility through sample testing before committing.

To make a data-driven decision, start by mapping your production lifecycle: since you’re targeting 100,000 units annually for at least 2-3 years, prioritize long-term stability over upfront cost. First, require all suppliers to provide **mold material hardness test reports** (hardened steel should reach HRC 50-55 to resist wear from flame-retardant resins). Second, evaluate **gate design through flow simulation data**—multi-gate designs reduce warpage by 20-30% in thick insulation parts, which is critical for maintaining the ±0.05mm tolerance at the grip-shaft interface. Finally, request sample runs with your exact UL94 V-0 resin to validate adhesion between the steel shaft and plastic grip, and check for flash or dimensional drift after 1,000 test cycles. Supplier B’s proposal, while more costly upfront, will minimize post-processing needs, reduce maintenance downtime, and ensure compliance with your electrical equipment’s performance requirements over the long term.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 2

When evaluating gate design proposals, pay close attention to how gate location impacts weld line placement and insulation integrity. Single side gates create weld lines on the opposite side of the grip, which can act as weak points in the insulation, potentially failing flame retardancy tests under prolonged heat exposure. Multi-gate designs distribute resin flow evenly around the steel shaft, placing weld lines in non-critical, low-stress areas that don’t compromise electrical safety.

Additionally, gate size must match the viscosity of your UL94 V-0 resin—these resins are often more viscous than standard plastics, so undersized gates can cause flow marks or incomplete filling of the mold cavity. Request each supplier to provide flow simulation data that maps weld line positions, pressure distribution, and fill time for your specific part design. This will help you verify if their gate design minimizes the risk of insulation failure and ensures consistent part quality.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Linda Xu
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 3

Before committing to a supplier, review their design-for-manufacture (DFM) feedback on your part design, particularly around draft angles and wall thickness consistency. Insufficient draft angles (less than 1° per side) on the grip’s inner and outer surfaces can lead to ejection marks during production, which can create gaps in the insulation and compromise flame retardancy.

Similarly, wall thickness variations over 0.2mm can cause uneven cooling, leading to warpage that exceeds your ±0.05mm tolerance requirement. Ask each supplier to identify any design adjustments needed to improve toolability without sacrificing function—for example, adding a slight draft to the grip’s inner surface or adjusting the wall thickness in high-stress areas to ensure uniform cooling. A supplier that proactively provides actionable DFM feedback will reduce the risk of mold rework and production delays.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 4

Evaluate each supplier’s proposal based on cycle time consistency and automation compatibility, as these factors directly impact long-term production efficiency. Aluminum molds may offer a slightly faster initial cycle time (20 seconds) due to better heat conductivity, but as the mold wears, cycle time increases to 25 seconds due to flash and dimensional drift that requires additional processing.

Hardened steel molds maintain a consistent 22-second cycle time throughout their lifecycle, which simplifies production scheduling and reduces labor costs. Additionally, multi-gate molds are easier to integrate with robotic part ejection systems, eliminating manual handling and reducing the risk of part damage. Calculate the total production time over a 2-year period, including downtime for mold maintenance and rework, to compare the true cost efficiency of each option.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 5

Dig into the details of mold steel selection and machining tolerances to assess long-term durability. Aluminum molds are cost-effective but wear 3-5 times faster than hardened steel when used with abrasive flame-retardant resins, leading to dimensional drift within 50,000 cycles. Hardened P20 steel (HRC 50-55) offers a balance of durability and cost, with a projected mold life of 500,000+ cycles, while S7 tool steel provides even better wear resistance for high-volume runs.

Machining tolerances are equally critical—suppliers should hold ±0.02mm on mold cavities to ensure your part meets the ±0.05mm tolerance requirement. Ask each supplier for maintenance schedules and cost estimates: aluminum molds require polishing every 10,000 cycles, while hardened steel molds only need polishing every 50,000 cycles, reducing long-term maintenance costs.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Amy Li
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 6

Focus on end-use performance validation to ensure the molded parts meet your electrical equipment’s safety and functional requirements. Dimensional drift at the grip-shaft interface can cause the screwdriver to slip during use, creating safety hazards in electrical applications.

Conduct torque testing on sample parts to verify the grip doesn’t slip under a 15N·m load, which is the typical torque requirement for electrical screwdrivers. Additionally, weld lines in high-stress areas can compromise flame retardancy, as they create paths for heat transfer.

Perform UL94 vertical burn testing on parts with weld lines to ensure they meet V-0 requirements, even after 100 cycles of use. Ask each supplier to provide test reports or allow you to conduct these tests on their sample parts to confirm field performance.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Olivia Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 7

Assess how each supplier addresses resin-metal adhesion, a critical factor for preventing grip separation in electrical tool parts. UL94 V-0 resins vary in their adhesion properties to steel—some grades require a primer or surface treatment of the steel shaft to ensure a strong bond. Higher-adhesion resins cost 10-15% more than standard grades, but they reduce the risk of grip failure, which can lead to product recalls.

Ask each supplier if they can recommend resin grades compatible with your steel shafts, and if they offer surface treatment services (like phosphating) to improve adhesion without adding extra cost. Additionally, compare the cost-performance of their recommended resins: a slightly more expensive resin that eliminates the need for primer can reduce total production costs over time.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Jason Zhou
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 8

Evaluate each supplier’s ability to maintain high yield rates over the production lifecycle, as yield directly impacts cost per unit. Single-gate molds typically have a 92% yield due to warpage and incomplete filling, while multi-gate molds can achieve a 98% yield by distributing resin flow evenly.

Aluminum molds require frequent rework every 10,000 cycles, creating production bottlenecks that reduce overall efficiency. Modular molds allow quick changeovers of individual inserts, reducing setup time by 30% and minimizing downtime.

Ask each supplier for their process improvement plans—for example, how they will monitor yield rates, identify bottlenecks, and implement lean methods to maintain consistent quality over time. A supplier with a proactive approach to process improvement will help you reduce waste and lower production costs.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Rachel Huang
**Date:** 2026-10-01

### Answer 9

Consider tolerance stack-up and assembly compatibility when evaluating supplier proposals. The grip’s ±0.05mm tolerance must align with the steel shaft’s tolerance to ensure a tight fit that prevents slipping during assembly and use. A supplier that can simulate tolerance stack-up for the entire assembly will help you avoid fit issues that require post-processing.

Additionally, parts with flash require manual deburring, adding 5 seconds per part to assembly time and increasing labor costs. Ask each supplier to provide sample parts that meet your assembly fit requirements without post-processing, and verify that their mold design minimizes flash by including proper venting and gate size. A supplier that prioritizes assembly compatibility will reduce your overall production costs and streamline your assembly line.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Eric Zhao
**Date:** 2026-10-01

## Related Resources

- [Injection Molding Q&A](https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/injection-molding/)
- [Plastic Injection Molding](https://www.ok-tool.com/capabilities/plastic-injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Guide](https://www.ok-tool.com/manufacturing/injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Buying Guides](https://www.ok-tool.com/buying/injection-molding/)
- [Products](https://www.ok-tool.com/products/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.ok-tool.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/)
- [Injection Molding](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/injection-molding/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What Key Quality Control Points Matter for Injection Molding Metal Tool Parts in Electrical Equipment?",
        "text": "As a supply chain manager responsible for mold procurement, I’m currently evaluating three suppliers for our new line of insulated screwdriver handles—overmolded steel shaft tool parts for electrical equipment—targeting 100,000 units annually. Each supplier has distinct proposals: Supplier A offers a low-cost aluminum mold with a single side gate, quoting a 3-week lead time but no long-term maintenance plan. Supplier B proposes a hardened steel mold with a multi-gate design, citing better dimensional stability but a 6-week lead time and 30% higher upfront cost. Supplier C’s mid-priced option uses modular steel inserts with a sub-gate, claiming easier maintenance but unproven performance with our UL94 V-0 flame-retardant resin. Past projects have suffered from mold wear causing ±0.1mm dimensional drift at the grip-shaft interface, leading to assembly jams, and flash that required post-processing. I need clear criteria to compare these options, balancing upfront cost, long-term reliability, defect rates, and compliance with our electrical equipment’s insulation and dimensional requirements.",
        "answerCount": 9,
        "upvoteCount": 10,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-01T13:48:28Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-01T13:58:53Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The core differences between the three supplier proposals lie in mold material durability, gate design efficiency, and maintenance flexibility. Supplier A’s aluminum mold offers low upfront cost and fast lead times but lacks the hardness needed for high-volume production with abrasive flame-retardant resins—aluminum wears 3-5 times faster than hardened steel, leading to dimensional drift and flash within 50,000 cycles. The single side gate also increases the risk of warpage in the thick insulation grip, as the resin cools unevenly around the steel shaft. Supplier B’s hardened steel mold addresses wear issues, with a projected mold life of 500,000+ cycles, and its multi-gate design distributes resin flow evenly, minimizing warpage and ensuring consistent insulation thickness. However, the higher upfront cost and longer lead time require a longer production horizon to justify. Supplier C’s modular steel inserts balance durability and maintenance: individual gate or cavity inserts can be replaced without rebuilding the entire mold, reducing downtime, but the unproven performance with your UL94 V-0 resin introduces risk of adhesion issues or material degradation. Each option aligns with specific production scenarios. Supplier A is suitable for short-run, low-volume projects (under 30,000 units) where cost and speed are priorities, but it will require frequent mold rework for your 100,000-unit annual target. Supplier B’s hardened steel mold is ideal for multi-year, high-volume production, as its long life reduces total cost of ownership over time and ensures consistent compliance with dimensional and insulation requirements. Supplier C’s modular design works best if you anticipate frequent design tweaks or need to adjust gate locations post-launch, but you’ll need to validate resin compatibility through sample testing before committing. To make a data-driven decision, start by mapping your production lifecycle: since you’re targeting 100,000 units annually for at least 2-3 years, prioritize long-term stability over upfront cost. First, require all suppliers to provide **mold material hardness test reports** (hardened steel should reach HRC 50-55 to resist wear from flame-retardant resins). Second, evaluate **gate design through flow simulation data**—multi-gate designs reduce warpage by 20-30% in thick insulation parts, which is critical for maintaining the ±0.05mm tolerance at the grip-shaft interface. Finally, request sample runs with your exact UL94 V-0 resin to validate adhesion between the steel shaft and plastic grip, and check for flash or dimensional drift after 1,000 test cycles. Supplier B’s proposal, while more costly upfront, will minimize post-processing needs, reduce maintenance downtime, and ensure compliance with your electrical equipment’s performance requirements over the long term.",
            "upvoteCount": 10,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:29:56Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/sophia.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "When evaluating gate design proposals, pay close attention to how gate location impacts weld line placement and insulation integrity. Single side gates create weld lines on the opposite side of the grip, which can act as weak points in the insulation, potentially failing flame retardancy tests under prolonged heat exposure. Multi-gate designs distribute resin flow evenly around the steel shaft, placing weld lines in non-critical, low-stress areas that don’t compromise electrical safety. Additionally, gate size must match the viscosity of your UL94 V-0 resin—these resins are often more viscous than standard plastics, so undersized gates can cause flow marks or incomplete filling of the mold cavity. Request each supplier to provide flow simulation data that maps weld line positions, pressure distribution, and fill time for your specific part design. This will help you verify if their gate design minimizes the risk of insulation failure and ensures consistent part quality.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:29:23Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/linda.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Before committing to a supplier, review their design-for-manufacture (DFM) feedback on your part design, particularly around draft angles and wall thickness consistency. Insufficient draft angles (less than 1° per side) on the grip’s inner and outer surfaces can lead to ejection marks during production, which can create gaps in the insulation and compromise flame retardancy. Similarly, wall thickness variations over 0.2mm can cause uneven cooling, leading to warpage that exceeds your ±0.05mm tolerance requirement. Ask each supplier to identify any design adjustments needed to improve toolability without sacrificing function—for example, adding a slight draft to the grip’s inner surface or adjusting the wall thickness in high-stress areas to ensure uniform cooling. A supplier that proactively provides actionable DFM feedback will reduce the risk of mold rework and production delays.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:25:31Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Evaluate each supplier’s proposal based on cycle time consistency and automation compatibility, as these factors directly impact long-term production efficiency. Aluminum molds may offer a slightly faster initial cycle time (20 seconds) due to better heat conductivity, but as the mold wears, cycle time increases to 25 seconds due to flash and dimensional drift that requires additional processing. Hardened steel molds maintain a consistent 22-second cycle time throughout their lifecycle, which simplifies production scheduling and reduces labor costs. Additionally, multi-gate molds are easier to integrate with robotic part ejection systems, eliminating manual handling and reducing the risk of part damage. Calculate the total production time over a 2-year period, including downtime for mold maintenance and rework, to compare the true cost efficiency of each option.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:23:00Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/michael.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Dig into the details of mold steel selection and machining tolerances to assess long-term durability. Aluminum molds are cost-effective but wear 3-5 times faster than hardened steel when used with abrasive flame-retardant resins, leading to dimensional drift within 50,000 cycles. Hardened P20 steel (HRC 50-55) offers a balance of durability and cost, with a projected mold life of 500,000+ cycles, while S7 tool steel provides even better wear resistance for high-volume runs. Machining tolerances are equally critical—suppliers should hold ±0.02mm on mold cavities to ensure your part meets the ±0.05mm tolerance requirement. Ask each supplier for maintenance schedules and cost estimates: aluminum molds require polishing every 10,000 cycles, while hardened steel molds only need polishing every 50,000 cycles, reducing long-term maintenance costs.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:13:25Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Amy Li","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/amy.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Focus on end-use performance validation to ensure the molded parts meet your electrical equipment’s safety and functional requirements. Dimensional drift at the grip-shaft interface can cause the screwdriver to slip during use, creating safety hazards in electrical applications. Conduct torque testing on sample parts to verify the grip doesn’t slip under a 15N·m load, which is the typical torque requirement for electrical screwdrivers. Additionally, weld lines in high-stress areas can compromise flame retardancy, as they create paths for heat transfer. Perform UL94 vertical burn testing on parts with weld lines to ensure they meet V-0 requirements, even after 100 cycles of use. Ask each supplier to provide test reports or allow you to conduct these tests on their sample parts to confirm field performance.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:10:51Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/olivia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Assess how each supplier addresses resin-metal adhesion, a critical factor for preventing grip separation in electrical tool parts. UL94 V-0 resins vary in their adhesion properties to steel—some grades require a primer or surface treatment of the steel shaft to ensure a strong bond. Higher-adhesion resins cost 10-15% more than standard grades, but they reduce the risk of grip failure, which can lead to product recalls. Ask each supplier if they can recommend resin grades compatible with your steel shafts, and if they offer surface treatment services (like phosphating) to improve adhesion without adding extra cost. Additionally, compare the cost-performance of their recommended resins: a slightly more expensive resin that eliminates the need for primer can reduce total production costs over time.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:05:27Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/jason.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Evaluate each supplier’s ability to maintain high yield rates over the production lifecycle, as yield directly impacts cost per unit. Single-gate molds typically have a 92% yield due to warpage and incomplete filling, while multi-gate molds can achieve a 98% yield by distributing resin flow evenly. Aluminum molds require frequent rework every 10,000 cycles, creating production bottlenecks that reduce overall efficiency. Modular molds allow quick changeovers of individual inserts, reducing setup time by 30% and minimizing downtime. Ask each supplier for their process improvement plans—for example, how they will monitor yield rates, identify bottlenecks, and implement lean methods to maintain consistent quality over time. A supplier with a proactive approach to process improvement will help you reduce waste and lower production costs.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T14:02:23Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Rachel Huang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/rachel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Consider tolerance stack-up and assembly compatibility when evaluating supplier proposals. The grip’s ±0.05mm tolerance must align with the steel shaft’s tolerance to ensure a tight fit that prevents slipping during assembly and use. A supplier that can simulate tolerance stack-up for the entire assembly will help you avoid fit issues that require post-processing. Additionally, parts with flash require manual deburring, adding 5 seconds per part to assembly time and increasing labor costs. Ask each supplier to provide sample parts that meet your assembly fit requirements without post-processing, and verify that their mold design minimizes flash by including proper venting and gate size. A supplier that prioritizes assembly compatibility will reduce your overall production costs and streamline your assembly line.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/key-quality-control-points-injection-molding-metal-tool-parts-electrical-equipment.html#suggestedAnswer-9",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-01T13:58:53Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/eric.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Injection Molding Q&A", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/injection-molding/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "What Key Quality Control Points Matter for Injection Molding Metal Tool Parts in Electrical Equipment?"}
      ]
    }
]
```