---
title: "What key factors affect the surface finish of matte TPR injection mold parts?"
description: "Resolve common pain points including uneven matte finish, unforeseen cost overruns and short mold service life for TPR grip parts, with clear specification checklists, cost benchmarks and supplier validation rules to cut sample lead time and avoid post-production quality risks."
url: "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Injection Molding Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-06"
dateModified: "2026-10-06"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 10
---

# What key factors affect the surface finish of matte TPR injection mold parts?

## Question

 I am a product development manager leading an OEM sample run for a new household non-slip grip product scheduled to launch in Q4 2026, and we hit a major roadblock last week when our previous mold vendor delivered first test parts with uneven matte finish, random shiny spots, and 12% of the samples have hidden flow marks under standard 600-lux office lighting. We already spent 6 weeks on initial tooling and wasted nearly $2,800 on misused TPR test material, and our final prototype sign-off deadline is only 3 weeks away. I need to source a new supplier for a dedicated matte TPR injection mold, but I do not know which technical requirements I must list in the RFQ to avoid repeating the same mistakes, what cost range we should expect for a 2+2 cavity mold for 40A soft TPR material, and how to tell if a vendor actually has proven experience with this specific tool type instead of quoting a generic standard injection mold. I cannot afford to push back the launch timeline, and I do not want to rework the tool a second time after final payment. 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

First, sort out the mandatory technical requirements you must include in your RFQ to eliminate generic non-specialized quotes. Explicitly state that the mold is purpose-built for 35A to 55A shore hardness TPR, with a pre-defined textured surface etched to VDI 3400 24 or equivalent matte level, no manual hand polishing on the cavity surface after etching is completed. **All RFQ submissions must include a clear breakdown of cavity steel grade, external etching supplier name, and expected cycle time per part**, this immediately filters out vendors who plan to use pre-owned stock mold bases or low-quality P20 steel without proper hardening treatment.

For cost and lead time reference, a 2+2 cavity matte TPR injection mold targeted for 100k to 150k total shot life has a realistic 2026 price range of $3,200 to $4,500 in Zhejiang manufacturing clusters. Quotes below $3,000 almost always skip the dedicated TPR flow channel optimization step, which directly leads to the exact shiny spots and flow marks you observed on your first test parts. Normal lead time for first article samples is 12 to 18 working days, if a vendor promises delivery under 10 days without a pre-existing similar mold design in their internal library, they are cutting corners on steel stress relief or texture etching curing time. **You should reserve 10% of the total mold payment as a quality hold, to be released only after 50 consecutive test parts show 100% consistent matte finish under 600-lux office lighting**.

For supplier judgment, do not evaluate vendors by edited website case photos, request them to provide 3 physical matte TPR sample parts made from molds they built in the past 12 months, and check for any gate witness that breaks the continuous matte surface. Ask them to show their standard process record of how they clean the cavity after etching to remove residual polishing compound that causes local shiny spots. For high volume production plans over 500k shots, confirm that the mold has a separate sealed ejector pin design to avoid TPR material leakage leaving burrs that require manual trimming. **Any vendor that cannot explain the difference between a matte TPR mold and a general ABS matte mold on their first call does not meet your minimum qualification bar**.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 2

The matte finish consistency is directly tied to the TPR formulation you select for the project. Many low-cost off-the-shelf TPR blends have excess processing oil that will leach out onto the cavity surface during the first 500 shots, leaving uneven glossy patches that cannot be fixed by adjusting injection parameters. If your product does not have strict food contact requirements, select a 40A TPR grade with less than 8% mineral oil content, and avoid blends that add recycled TPR powder at more than 15% ratio.

When you test samples from the new mold, run 100 consecutive shots and leave the parts on the workbench for 72 hours, then check for any oil bloom that creates semi-transparent spots on the matte surface. This test takes almost no extra cost, but it eliminates 90% of hidden quality issues that will only pop up 3 months after mass production starts.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Amy Li
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 3

The gate location for matte TPR parts can never be placed on the main visible matte surface, as the high shear force at the gate will break the uniform texture and leave a 5 to 8mm shiny circular zone that cannot be removed by post processing. For small non-slip grip parts, the best hidden gate position is at the bottom non-contact edge of the part, using a submarine gate with a 1.2mm diameter opening.

Do not use a hot tip gate for this type of part, as the frequent temperature fluctuation at the gate nozzle will leave accumulated degraded TPR residue that drips onto the part surface, creating random dark glossy dots. All cold runners on the mold should have a full round cross section with at least 6mm diameter, to avoid excessive shear heating that changes the material flow pattern across the cavity surface.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Rachel Huang
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 4

For matte TPR molds, the cavity steel must go through full stress relief treatment after rough machining, before the surface etching process starts. If the mold maker skips this 12-hour stress relief step, the internal stress of the steel will release after 2000 to 3000 production shots, creating micro cracks on the cavity surface that break the matte texture and leave thin shiny lines across the part.

For production volumes under 200k shots, properly hardened P20 steel is fully sufficient, while volumes over 500k shots should use 1.2311 pre-hardened steel that can be re-etched 2 to 3 times after the original matte texture wears out. The expected maintenance cycle for this type of mold is every 25,000 shots, you only need to wipe the cavity surface with food grade silicone cleaner to remove residual TPR additive buildup, no other complex polishing work is required.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 5

The minimum draft angle for a matte TPR part with VDI 24 texture is 2.5 degrees, if your current 3D file uses a 1.5 degree draft angle borrowed from a smooth ABS part, the deep texture on the cavity will drag the soft TPR material during ejection, tearing small patches of the matte surface and creating irregular shiny marks on the outer part wall.

The wall thickness variation across the entire TPR part should not exceed 30%, if you have a thick boss section on the back of the grip part, add a 0.8mm flow channel groove on the non-visible inner side to reduce localized material accumulation. This prevents the slow cooling thick section from sinking and distorting the matte texture on the opposite outer surface, no change to the outer appearance of your final product is required to implement this adjustment.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Eric Zhao
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 6

Matte TPR parts do not require extended holding pressure time after injection, if the process is tuned correctly total cycle time for a 2+2 cavity mold with 4mm average wall thickness can stay at 38 to 42 seconds. Many new production teams mistakenly add 10+ seconds of extra holding pressure to reduce part shrinkage, which squeezes excess TPR material into the tiny gaps of the cavity matte texture, flattening the surface and creating inconsistent gloss levels across different batches.

You can pre-set a fixed process parameter range on the injection machine for this specific mold, lock the maximum injection speed and holding pressure values, to prevent different shift operators from making arbitrary adjustments that break the matte finish consistency. This reduces production line yield loss from typical 8% for unoptimized TPR parts to under 2%.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 7

You can add a 5 second low pressure air blow step right after mold opening before ejection, this clears any loose TPR micro residue that sticks to the cavity surface after each shot, eliminating the random tiny bright spots that usually cause 3 to 4% of part rejection during mass production.

For quality inspection, you do not need to check every single part under professional lighting, install a 6500K neutral white LED light bar at the end of the conveyor 1 meter away from the operator station, this lets workers spot uneven matte finish instantly without extra training. You can also keep a standard reference sample panel on the shop floor that marks the minimum acceptable matte level, all parts that are glossier than the reference panel get rejected immediately, this avoids inconsistent judgment from different inspectors across different shifts.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Emily Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 8

The 3 week remaining timeline can be broken down into 3 clear checkpoints to avoid missing the prototype sign-off deadline. First, within 2 working days after the new vendor is confirmed, share all technical requirements and confirm they sign off on all the texture, steel, and sample quality rules in writing. Second, at the 10 working day mark after tooling starts, request a short 10 second video of the vendor running 5 consecutive test shots, so you can verify that the initial matte finish is uniform before they do full sample production.

Third, schedule the final sample inspection 2 working days before your internal deadline, this leaves a small buffer for minor parameter adjustments if any tiny flow marks are found. If you follow these 3 checkpoints, you will avoid the common situation where vendors rush to deliver untested parts 1 day before deadline with no room for correction.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Kevin Liu
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 9

The matte TPR surface you get from the new mold should not only look non-glossy, it also needs to keep its non-slip performance after 1000 cycles of hand rubbing with 2kg of force. Some over-etched coarse matte textures may look perfect at first, but the tiny raised texture peaks will wear down quickly during daily use, turning the grip surface smooth and slippery after 2 months of consumer usage.

When you test the first batch of samples, take 10 parts and rub the surface with a cotton cloth for 500 cycles, if the rubbed area turns visibly shinier than the rest of the part, the cavity etching is too deep, and the vendor needs to reduce the texture roughness level slightly to balance the matte visual effect and long term wear performance. This validation step adds no more than 1 hour of extra testing work, and prevents massive product return issues after full launch.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Olivia Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-06

### Answer 10

The matte TPR part will usually be overmolded onto a hard PP or ABS plastic core part, the dimensional tolerance of the TPR outer layer must stay within ±0.15mm to avoid fit issues during assembly. If the mold has uneven venting, the TPR material will flow slightly past the designed parting line, creating a very thin 0.2mm flash that wraps around the edge of the part, which breaks the continuous matte surface and causes misalignment when pressing the grip onto the core component.

All vent gaps on the parting line of the matte TPR mold should be set to 0.015mm maximum, which is small enough to prevent flash formation, and does not leave visible vent marks on the finished part surface. This eliminates the need for manual trimming work that can leave scratch marks on the delicate matte TPR surface, cutting your total assembly labor cost by 20% at volume.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Jason Zhou
**Date:** 2026-10-06

## Related Resources

- [Injection Molding Q&A](https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/injection-molding/)
- [Plastic Injection Molding](https://www.ok-tool.com/capabilities/plastic-injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Guide](https://www.ok-tool.com/manufacturing/injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Buying Guides](https://www.ok-tool.com/buying/injection-molding/)
- [Products](https://www.ok-tool.com/products/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.ok-tool.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/)
- [Injection Molding](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/injection-molding/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What key factors affect the surface finish of matte TPR injection mold parts?",
        "text": "I am a product development manager leading an OEM sample run for a new household non-slip grip product scheduled to launch in Q4 2026, and we hit a major roadblock last week when our previous mold vendor delivered first test parts with uneven matte finish, random shiny spots, and 12% of the samples have hidden flow marks under standard 600-lux office lighting. We already spent 6 weeks on initial tooling and wasted nearly $2,800 on misused TPR test material, and our final prototype sign-off deadline is only 3 weeks away. I need to source a new supplier for a dedicated matte TPR injection mold, but I do not know which technical requirements I must list in the RFQ to avoid repeating the same mistakes, what cost range we should expect for a 2+2 cavity mold for 40A soft TPR material, and how to tell if a vendor actually has proven experience with this specific tool type instead of quoting a generic standard injection mold. I cannot afford to push back the launch timeline, and I do not want to rework the tool a second time after final payment.",
        "answerCount": 10,
        "upvoteCount": 10,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-06T07:56:52Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-06T08:22:13Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "First, sort out the mandatory technical requirements you must include in your RFQ to eliminate generic non-specialized quotes. Explicitly state that the mold is purpose-built for 35A to 55A shore hardness TPR, with a pre-defined textured surface etched to VDI 3400 24 or equivalent matte level, no manual hand polishing on the cavity surface after etching is completed. All RFQ submissions must include a clear breakdown of cavity steel grade, external etching supplier name, and expected cycle time per part , this immediately filters out vendors who plan to use pre-owned stock mold bases or low-quality P20 steel without proper hardening treatment. For cost and lead time reference, a 2+2 cavity matte TPR injection mold targeted for 100k to 150k total shot life has a realistic 2026 price range of $3,200 to $4,500 in Zhejiang manufacturing clusters. Quotes below $3,000 almost always skip the dedicated TPR flow channel optimization step, which directly leads to the exact shiny spots and flow marks you observed on your first test parts. Normal lead time for first article samples is 12 to 18 working days, if a vendor promises delivery under 10 days without a pre-existing similar mold design in their internal library, they are cutting corners on steel stress relief or texture etching curing time. You should reserve 10% of the total mold payment as a quality hold, to be released only after 50 consecutive test parts show 100% consistent matte finish under 600-lux office lighting . For supplier judgment, do not evaluate vendors by edited website case photos, request them to provide 3 physical matte TPR sample parts made from molds they built in the past 12 months, and check for any gate witness that breaks the continuous matte surface. Ask them to show their standard process record of how they clean the cavity after etching to remove residual polishing compound that causes local shiny spots. For high volume production plans over 500k shots, confirm that the mold has a separate sealed ejector pin design to avoid TPR material leakage leaving burrs that require manual trimming. Any vendor that cannot explain the difference between a matte TPR mold and a general ABS matte mold on their first call does not meet your minimum qualification bar .",
            "upvoteCount": 10,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T10:29:15Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/michael.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The matte finish consistency is directly tied to the TPR formulation you select for the project. Many low-cost off-the-shelf TPR blends have excess processing oil that will leach out onto the cavity surface during the first 500 shots, leaving uneven glossy patches that cannot be fixed by adjusting injection parameters. If your product does not have strict food contact requirements, select a 40A TPR grade with less than 8% mineral oil content, and avoid blends that add recycled TPR powder at more than 15% ratio. When you test samples from the new mold, run 100 consecutive shots and leave the parts on the workbench for 72 hours, then check for any oil bloom that creates semi-transparent spots on the matte surface. This test takes almost no extra cost, but it eliminates 90% of hidden quality issues that will only pop up 3 months after mass production starts.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T10:22:23Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Amy Li","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/amy.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The gate location for matte TPR parts can never be placed on the main visible matte surface, as the high shear force at the gate will break the uniform texture and leave a 5 to 8mm shiny circular zone that cannot be removed by post processing. For small non-slip grip parts, the best hidden gate position is at the bottom non-contact edge of the part, using a submarine gate with a 1.2mm diameter opening. Do not use a hot tip gate for this type of part, as the frequent temperature fluctuation at the gate nozzle will leave accumulated degraded TPR residue that drips onto the part surface, creating random dark glossy dots. All cold runners on the mold should have a full round cross section with at least 6mm diameter, to avoid excessive shear heating that changes the material flow pattern across the cavity surface.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T09:52:57Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Rachel Huang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/rachel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "For matte TPR molds, the cavity steel must go through full stress relief treatment after rough machining, before the surface etching process starts. If the mold maker skips this 12-hour stress relief step, the internal stress of the steel will release after 2000 to 3000 production shots, creating micro cracks on the cavity surface that break the matte texture and leave thin shiny lines across the part. For production volumes under 200k shots, properly hardened P20 steel is fully sufficient, while volumes over 500k shots should use 1.2311 pre-hardened steel that can be re-etched 2 to 3 times after the original matte texture wears out. The expected maintenance cycle for this type of mold is every 25,000 shots, you only need to wipe the cavity surface with food grade silicone cleaner to remove residual TPR additive buildup, no other complex polishing work is required.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T09:48:40Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The minimum draft angle for a matte TPR part with VDI 24 texture is 2.5 degrees, if your current 3D file uses a 1.5 degree draft angle borrowed from a smooth ABS part, the deep texture on the cavity will drag the soft TPR material during ejection, tearing small patches of the matte surface and creating irregular shiny marks on the outer part wall. The wall thickness variation across the entire TPR part should not exceed 30%, if you have a thick boss section on the back of the grip part, add a 0.8mm flow channel groove on the non-visible inner side to reduce localized material accumulation. This prevents the slow cooling thick section from sinking and distorting the matte texture on the opposite outer surface, no change to the outer appearance of your final product is required to implement this adjustment.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T09:37:00Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/eric.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Matte TPR parts do not require extended holding pressure time after injection, if the process is tuned correctly total cycle time for a 2+2 cavity mold with 4mm average wall thickness can stay at 38 to 42 seconds. Many new production teams mistakenly add 10+ seconds of extra holding pressure to reduce part shrinkage, which squeezes excess TPR material into the tiny gaps of the cavity matte texture, flattening the surface and creating inconsistent gloss levels across different batches. You can pre-set a fixed process parameter range on the injection machine for this specific mold, lock the maximum injection speed and holding pressure values, to prevent different shift operators from making arbitrary adjustments that break the matte finish consistency. This reduces production line yield loss from typical 8% for unoptimized TPR parts to under 2%.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T09:18:49Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/sophia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "You can add a 5 second low pressure air blow step right after mold opening before ejection, this clears any loose TPR micro residue that sticks to the cavity surface after each shot, eliminating the random tiny bright spots that usually cause 3 to 4% of part rejection during mass production. For quality inspection, you do not need to check every single part under professional lighting, install a 6500K neutral white LED light bar at the end of the conveyor 1 meter away from the operator station, this lets workers spot uneven matte finish instantly without extra training. You can also keep a standard reference sample panel on the shop floor that marks the minimum acceptable matte level, all parts that are glossier than the reference panel get rejected immediately, this avoids inconsistent judgment from different inspectors across different shifts.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T09:06:42Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/emily.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The 3 week remaining timeline can be broken down into 3 clear checkpoints to avoid missing the prototype sign-off deadline. First, within 2 working days after the new vendor is confirmed, share all technical requirements and confirm they sign off on all the texture, steel, and sample quality rules in writing. Second, at the 10 working day mark after tooling starts, request a short 10 second video of the vendor running 5 consecutive test shots, so you can verify that the initial matte finish is uniform before they do full sample production. Third, schedule the final sample inspection 2 working days before your internal deadline, this leaves a small buffer for minor parameter adjustments if any tiny flow marks are found. If you follow these 3 checkpoints, you will avoid the common situation where vendors rush to deliver untested parts 1 day before deadline with no room for correction.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T08:48:37Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Kevin Liu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/kevin.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The matte TPR surface you get from the new mold should not only look non-glossy, it also needs to keep its non-slip performance after 1000 cycles of hand rubbing with 2kg of force. Some over-etched coarse matte textures may look perfect at first, but the tiny raised texture peaks will wear down quickly during daily use, turning the grip surface smooth and slippery after 2 months of consumer usage. When you test the first batch of samples, take 10 parts and rub the surface with a cotton cloth for 500 cycles, if the rubbed area turns visibly shinier than the rest of the part, the cavity etching is too deep, and the vendor needs to reduce the texture roughness level slightly to balance the matte visual effect and long term wear performance. This validation step adds no more than 1 hour of extra testing work, and prevents massive product return issues after full launch.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-9",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T08:23:44Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/olivia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The matte TPR part will usually be overmolded onto a hard PP or ABS plastic core part, the dimensional tolerance of the TPR outer layer must stay within ±0.15mm to avoid fit issues during assembly. If the mold has uneven venting, the TPR material will flow slightly past the designed parting line, creating a very thin 0.2mm flash that wraps around the edge of the part, which breaks the continuous matte surface and causes misalignment when pressing the grip onto the core component. All vent gaps on the parting line of the matte TPR mold should be set to 0.015mm maximum, which is small enough to prevent flash formation, and does not leave visible vent marks on the finished part surface. This eliminates the need for manual trimming work that can leave scratch marks on the delicate matte TPR surface, cutting your total assembly labor cost by 20% at volume.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/factors-affecting-matte-tpr-injection-mold-surface-finish.html#suggestedAnswer-10",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-06T08:22:13Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/jason.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Injection Molding Q&A", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/injection-molding/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "What key factors affect the surface finish of matte TPR injection mold parts?"}
      ]
    }
]
```