--- title: "How to Evaluate Supplier Sampling and MOQ Terms for Injection Molding?" description: "A supply chain manager struggles with conflicting sampling terms and MOQs from molders. The solution is a detailed Sample RFQ, analysis of cost and lead time drivers, and evaluating supplier transparency to secure reliable low-volume production." url: "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html" language: "en" type: "Q&A" category: "China Sourcing Q&A" datePublished: "2026-09-26" dateModified: "2026-09-26" brand: "OK TOOL" manufacturer: "OK TOOL" answerCount: 9 --- # How to Evaluate Supplier Sampling and MOQ Terms for Injection Molding? ## Question I'm the supply chain manager for a power tools company, currently sourcing injection molding for a new cordless drill housing. We've narrowed it down to three Chinese suppliers after initial RFQs. The core dilemma is that each presents a different trade-off between sample lead time, minimum order quantity, and upfront costs. Supplier A quotes a very competitive per-part price but demands an MOQ of 15,000 units for the first order, with samples ready in 10 days. Supplier B offers a low MOQ of 1,000 pieces but needs 5 weeks for samples and has a higher sample fee. Supplier C has moderate terms but their quote lacks detail on sample inspection reports and their approval process seems vague. Our engineering team needs at least 50 good samples for fit, function, and drop testing, and we must get customer sign-off before greenlighting mass production. With a product launch window in Q3 2026, I'm under pressure to avoid delays but also don't want to get stuck with excess inventory if the design needs tweaks. From a manufacturer's perspective, what are the red flags and green lights in these sampling and MOQ terms? How should I structure my request to get comparable quotes that reveal their true capability and reliability? ## Answers ### Answer 1 — Best Answer Your situation highlights the core challenge in sourcing: separating marketing promises from manufacturing reality. The sampling phase is where a supplier's true capability, project management, and quality mindset are revealed, long before the mass production order is placed. To make a comparable assessment, you need to normalize the quoting process by providing a clear, detailed set of requirements and then dissect their responses. First, formalize your sample request. Instead of a simple "quote for samples," issue a Sample Request For Quotation (SRFQ) that specifies: the exact sample quantity needed for all validation stages (e.g., 30 for fit/function, 20 for reliability testing), the specific material grade and color (provide the data sheet), and the requirement for a **first article inspection (FAI) report** against your 2D drawing. Crucially, mandate that the sample fee—if any—is fully credited against the future production order. This eliminates suppliers who view sampling as a separate profit center. Also, require a documented sample approval process: who inspects, what metrics are checked, and the timeline for feedback and design change requests. With standardized requirements, you can now analyze cost and lead time drivers. A low MOQ (like 1,000 pieces) often carries a higher per-unit cost because the fixed costs of mold setup, machine time, and quality documentation are amortized over fewer parts. A supplier quoting a very low per-part price at a high MOQ (15,000) may be assuming ideal efficiency and material yield. Ask for a cost breakdown: material cost, machine hour rate, and setup fee. This transparency shows their costing logic and reveals if the low price is sustainable or a loss-leader. For lead time, a promise of 10 days for samples from a new mold is typically only possible if a standard, readily available material is used and the mold is extremely simple, or if they are using a pre-existing "similar" mold for rapid prototyping, which may not reflect final production quality. A more realistic timeline for a new, medium-complexity injection mold includes mold finalization (if not yet done), material ordering (1-2 weeks for specific grades), sample molding, cooling, trimming, and thorough inspection. Five to six weeks is often more credible for a controlled process. From a manufacturing standpoint, the material choice you've specified is a critical lead time factor. While common ABS or PP compounds are often in stock, engineered grades with specific UL ratings or color matches may have longer procurement lead times. A supplier promising ultra-fast samples might be planning to use a "close enough" material, which invalidates your mechanical and safety testing. Insist that the sample material batch number and a certificate of analysis (CoA) are provided. This ties into quality risk: a sample made from a short-run, manually adjusted process can look perfect but not be replicable in an automated production cycle. The FAI report should include critical-to-function dimensions from multiple cavities if it's a multi-cavity mold, showing process stability. A supplier unwilling to share this process capability data during sampling may be hiding variability issues. Your supplier judgment should then focus on their response to your detailed SRFQ. A capable manufacturer will welcome the clarity and provide comprehensive answers. Key green lights include: providing a Gantt chart for sample delivery, submitting a sample inspection checklist, offering a video walkthrough of the first-off samples, and clearly stating the conditions for mass production pricing (e.g., "the quoted production price is valid for orders of 5,000+ units placed within 90 days of sample approval"). Red flags are vagueness, resistance to providing an FAI report, pressure to skip validation steps, or a sample fee that doesn't credit forward. The supplier with the moderate terms but vague process (Supplier C) is a higher risk than one with a longer but transparent timeline. Finally, evaluate their project coordination. The sample phase is a microcosm of the full production run. Note how they handle your RFQ clarifications. Do they assign a single point of contact? Do they proactively ask about gate requirements for your internal approval? A supplier that treats sampling as a collaborative engineering milestone, rather than a simple sales transaction, is one that will likely manage the complexities of mass production with greater competence. Their ability to provide a realistic, detailed schedule and stick to it is a more valuable indicator than a superficially shorter lead time promise. This upfront diligence is your best insurance against costly delays and quality issues during the production ramp-up. **status:** accepted **Author:** David Zhang **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 2 Look beyond the quote document. Request evidence of their quality management system—a valid IATF 16949 or ISO 9001 certificate is a baseline, but ask for recent internal audit reports and corrective action records. During sampling, observe their process control: do they document the injection parameters (pressure, temperature, cycle time) for the sample run? This data is crucial for ensuring production repeatability. A red flag is if they cannot provide machine maintenance logs or mold calibration certificates. For low MOQ production, assess their flexibility: do they have dedicated smaller-tonnage machines for short runs, or will your job constantly be interrupted by larger orders? High employee turnover in their setup technician role can lead to inconsistent sample quality. Ask for a virtual or on-site tour of their sampling area; clutter, poor organization, or mixed material handling are strong indicators of systemic quality risks. **status:** suggested **Author:** Michael Wu **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 3 The speed and method of sample creation reveal their engineering approach. For complex parts, ask if they use a preliminary "soft" aluminum mold or 3D-printed inserts for the first iteration. This allows for faster, cheaper design validation before committing to hardened steel. Crucially, they should provide a Design for Manufacturability (DFM) report with the initial quote, highlighting potential issues like wall thickness variations or gate locations. During sampling, a capable partner will build a functional test plan with you—for a drill housing, this might include fixture drawings for assembly checks and drop test rigs. Their willingness to produce a second, quick-turn sample batch after a minor design tweak (and how they charge for it) is a key test of collaboration. Avoid suppliers who treat the sample as a final product; it should be an iterative development step. **status:** suggested **Author:** Kevin Liu **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 4 Samples must be evaluated in the context of the final assembly. Request that samples are not just visually inspected but are subjected to a fit-check with your existing internal components (motor, battery pack, screws). Look for subtle warpage or sink marks that only appear under assembly stress. Discuss the environmental and mechanical loads the part will face—impact, UV exposure, chemical contact—and ensure the sample material and process (e.g., glass fiber orientation) are validated for those conditions. A good supplier will ask for these application details upfront. They should also be able to comment on gate vestige location and its impact on user ergonomics or aesthetics. The goal is to catch "fit-for-purpose" failures now, not during mass production. Insist on receiving samples from the actual production-intent mold, not a prototype-only tool, to assess true performance. **status:** suggested **Author:** Jason Zhou **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 5 Deconstruct the quoted sample and MOQ pricing. Request a line-item breakdown: cost of resin per gram (accounting for sprue/runner waste), machine hourly rate (which varies by clamp tonnage), mold setup labor, and quality inspection time. For low MOQ runs, the setup cost as a percentage of the total is high; a transparent supplier will show this separately rather than burying it in the unit price. Ask how tooling amortization is calculated—is it a separate line item, or is it embedded in the part price? If embedded, a low MOQ quote may have an unrealistically high amortization charge per part, making future price reductions difficult. Also, inquire about their policy on regrind usage; excessive regrind can lower material cost but compromise part strength. Understanding these drivers allows you to negotiate on logic, not just price. **status:** suggested **Author:** Emily Chen **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 6 How samples are packaged and shipped is a test of their attention to detail. Specify your requirements: individual poly bags, anti-static protection if needed, reinforced corners for transit, and clear labeling with part number, revision, cavity number, and date. This level of traceability is essential for correlating any test failures back to the specific production batch. Ask for photos of the packed samples before shipment. Poor packaging that leads to scratched or deformed parts upon arrival wastes time and obscures true part quality. For moisture-sensitive materials like nylon, they should include desiccant and humidity indicator cards. This discipline in sample handling is a proxy for their overall process control and respect for the customer's timeline and requirements. **status:** suggested **Author:** Rachel Huang **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 7 The sampling promise must align with their actual production scheduling reality. Ask how they prioritize sample runs: is there a dedicated cell or team, or does it compete with high-volume production? If it's the latter, your sample timeline is at high risk of being delayed. For low MOQ production, understand their batch scheduling strategy. Will they combine your 1,000-piece order with another customer's job in a similar material to optimize machine time? If so, how do they ensure material purity and prevent cross-contamination? Request a capacity plan for the months following sample approval to ensure they can ramp up if needed. A supplier that is overly eager to lock in a long lead time for production might be capacity-constrained, while one that promises immediate production slots may not have a stable order book. **status:** suggested **Author:** Eric Zhao **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 8 The sample approval should be governed by a clear Inspection Test Plan (ITP). Demand to see this plan before samples are made. It should define the inspection equipment (CMM, calipers, visual standards), the sampling size from the batch, and the specific dimensions to be measured on the FAI report. For cosmetic parts, a signed limit sample or digital photos with agreed lighting should be established. Ask about their internal quality checkpoints: is there an in-process check during sample molding (IPQC), and a final outgoing inspection (OQC)? How do they classify and document defects? A robust system will have a non-conformance report (NCR) for any deviation, even on samples. This rigor during sampling is the best predictor of consistent quality in mass production. **status:** suggested **Author:** Amy Li **Date:** 2026-09-26 ### Answer 9 Treat the sampling phase as a mini-project. Evaluate their project management by requesting a clear milestone schedule: mold readiness, material arrival, first trial shot, inspection, and shipment. Identify a single point of contact who is responsible for communication and escalation. Crucially, establish a formal sample approval and change management process upfront. How are design changes requested and documented? What is the cost and timeline impact of a revision? A professional supplier will have a standard Engineering Change Request (ECR) form. Also, discuss the handoff from sampling to production: will the same team and process parameters be used? Clear protocols for issue resolution during sampling prevent confusion and delays later, ensuring a smoother transition to mass production. **status:** suggested **Author:** Olivia Chen **Date:** 2026-09-26 ## Related Resources - [China Sourcing Q&A](https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/china-sourcing/) - [China Sourcing Buying Guides](https://www.ok-tool.com/buying/china-sourcing/) - [Products](https://www.ok-tool.com/products/) - [Capabilities](https://www.ok-tool.com/capabilities/) - [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.ok-tool.com/custom-manufacturing/) - [Manufacturing Guides](https://www.ok-tool.com/manufacturing/) - [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/) ## Structured Data ```json [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "QAPage", "mainEntity": { "@type": "Question", "name": "How to Evaluate Supplier Sampling and MOQ Terms for Injection Molding?", "text": "I'm the supply chain manager for a power tools company, currently sourcing injection molding for a new cordless drill housing. We've narrowed it down to three Chinese suppliers after initial RFQs. The core dilemma is that each presents a different trade-off between sample lead time, minimum order quantity, and upfront costs. Supplier A quotes a very competitive per-part price but demands an MOQ of 15,000 units for the first order, with samples ready in 10 days. Supplier B offers a low MOQ of 1,000 pieces but needs 5 weeks for samples and has a higher sample fee. Supplier C has moderate terms but their quote lacks detail on sample inspection reports and their approval process seems vague. Our engineering team needs at least 50 good samples for fit, function, and drop testing, and we must get customer sign-off before greenlighting mass production. With a product launch window in Q3 2026, I'm under pressure to avoid delays but also don't want to get stuck with excess inventory if the design needs tweaks. From a manufacturer's perspective, what are the red flags and green lights in these sampling and MOQ terms? How should I structure my request to get comparable quotes that reveal their true capability and reliability?", "answerCount": 9, "upvoteCount": 9, "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:23:59Z", "dateModified": "2026-09-26T14:28:15Z", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Anonymous", "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html" } ,"acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Your situation highlights the core challenge in sourcing: separating marketing promises from manufacturing reality. The sampling phase is where a supplier's true capability, project management, and quality mindset are revealed, long before the mass production order is placed. To make a comparable assessment, you need to normalize the quoting process by providing a clear, detailed set of requirements and then dissect their responses. First, formalize your sample request. Instead of a simple "quote for samples," issue a Sample Request For Quotation (SRFQ) that specifies: the exact sample quantity needed for all validation stages (e.g., 30 for fit/function, 20 for reliability testing), the specific material grade and color (provide the data sheet), and the requirement for a first article inspection (FAI) report against your 2D drawing. Crucially, mandate that the sample fee—if any—is fully credited against the future production order. This eliminates suppliers who view sampling as a separate profit center. Also, require a documented sample approval process: who inspects, what metrics are checked, and the timeline for feedback and design change requests. With standardized requirements, you can now analyze cost and lead time drivers. A low MOQ (like 1,000 pieces) often carries a higher per-unit cost because the fixed costs of mold setup, machine time, and quality documentation are amortized over fewer parts. A supplier quoting a very low per-part price at a high MOQ (15,000) may be assuming ideal efficiency and material yield. Ask for a cost breakdown: material cost, machine hour rate, and setup fee. This transparency shows their costing logic and reveals if the low price is sustainable or a loss-leader. For lead time, a promise of 10 days for samples from a new mold is typically only possible if a standard, readily available material is used and the mold is extremely simple, or if they are using a pre-existing "similar" mold for rapid prototyping, which may not reflect final production quality. A more realistic timeline for a new, medium-complexity injection mold includes mold finalization (if not yet done), material ordering (1-2 weeks for specific grades), sample molding, cooling, trimming, and thorough inspection. Five to six weeks is often more credible for a controlled process. From a manufacturing standpoint, the material choice you've specified is a critical lead time factor. While common ABS or PP compounds are often in stock, engineered grades with specific UL ratings or color matches may have longer procurement lead times. A supplier promising ultra-fast samples might be planning to use a "close enough" material, which invalidates your mechanical and safety testing. Insist that the sample material batch number and a certificate of analysis (CoA) are provided. This ties into quality risk: a sample made from a short-run, manually adjusted process can look perfect but not be replicable in an automated production cycle. The FAI report should include critical-to-function dimensions from multiple cavities if it's a multi-cavity mold, showing process stability. A supplier unwilling to share this process capability data during sampling may be hiding variability issues. Your supplier judgment should then focus on their response to your detailed SRFQ. A capable manufacturer will welcome the clarity and provide comprehensive answers. Key green lights include: providing a Gantt chart for sample delivery, submitting a sample inspection checklist, offering a video walkthrough of the first-off samples, and clearly stating the conditions for mass production pricing (e.g., "the quoted production price is valid for orders of 5,000+ units placed within 90 days of sample approval"). Red flags are vagueness, resistance to providing an FAI report, pressure to skip validation steps, or a sample fee that doesn't credit forward. The supplier with the moderate terms but vague process (Supplier C) is a higher risk than one with a longer but transparent timeline. Finally, evaluate their project coordination. The sample phase is a microcosm of the full production run. Note how they handle your RFQ clarifications. Do they assign a single point of contact? Do they proactively ask about gate requirements for your internal approval? A supplier that treats sampling as a collaborative engineering milestone, rather than a simple sales transaction, is one that will likely manage the complexities of mass production with greater competence. Their ability to provide a realistic, detailed schedule and stick to it is a more valuable indicator than a superficially shorter lead time promise. This upfront diligence is your best insurance against costly delays and quality issues during the production ramp-up.", "upvoteCount": 9, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#acceptedAnswer", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:50:06Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "David Zhang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/david.html"} } ,"suggestedAnswer": [ { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Look beyond the quote document. Request evidence of their quality management system—a valid IATF 16949 or ISO 9001 certificate is a baseline, but ask for recent internal audit reports and corrective action records. During sampling, observe their process control: do they document the injection parameters (pressure, temperature, cycle time) for the sample run? This data is crucial for ensuring production repeatability. A red flag is if they cannot provide machine maintenance logs or mold calibration certificates. For low MOQ production, assess their flexibility: do they have dedicated smaller-tonnage machines for short runs, or will your job constantly be interrupted by larger orders? High employee turnover in their setup technician role can lead to inconsistent sample quality. Ask for a virtual or on-site tour of their sampling area; clutter, poor organization, or mixed material handling are strong indicators of systemic quality risks.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-2", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:45:18Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/michael.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The speed and method of sample creation reveal their engineering approach. For complex parts, ask if they use a preliminary "soft" aluminum mold or 3D-printed inserts for the first iteration. This allows for faster, cheaper design validation before committing to hardened steel. Crucially, they should provide a Design for Manufacturability (DFM) report with the initial quote, highlighting potential issues like wall thickness variations or gate locations. During sampling, a capable partner will build a functional test plan with you—for a drill housing, this might include fixture drawings for assembly checks and drop test rigs. Their willingness to produce a second, quick-turn sample batch after a minor design tweak (and how they charge for it) is a key test of collaboration. Avoid suppliers who treat the sample as a final product; it should be an iterative development step.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-3", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:45:11Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Kevin Liu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/kevin.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Samples must be evaluated in the context of the final assembly. Request that samples are not just visually inspected but are subjected to a fit-check with your existing internal components (motor, battery pack, screws). Look for subtle warpage or sink marks that only appear under assembly stress. Discuss the environmental and mechanical loads the part will face—impact, UV exposure, chemical contact—and ensure the sample material and process (e.g., glass fiber orientation) are validated for those conditions. A good supplier will ask for these application details upfront. They should also be able to comment on gate vestige location and its impact on user ergonomics or aesthetics. The goal is to catch "fit-for-purpose" failures now, not during mass production. Insist on receiving samples from the actual production-intent mold, not a prototype-only tool, to assess true performance.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-4", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:40:49Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/jason.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Deconstruct the quoted sample and MOQ pricing. Request a line-item breakdown: cost of resin per gram (accounting for sprue/runner waste), machine hourly rate (which varies by clamp tonnage), mold setup labor, and quality inspection time. For low MOQ runs, the setup cost as a percentage of the total is high; a transparent supplier will show this separately rather than burying it in the unit price. Ask how tooling amortization is calculated—is it a separate line item, or is it embedded in the part price? If embedded, a low MOQ quote may have an unrealistically high amortization charge per part, making future price reductions difficult. Also, inquire about their policy on regrind usage; excessive regrind can lower material cost but compromise part strength. Understanding these drivers allows you to negotiate on logic, not just price.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-5", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:36:10Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/emily.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "How samples are packaged and shipped is a test of their attention to detail. Specify your requirements: individual poly bags, anti-static protection if needed, reinforced corners for transit, and clear labeling with part number, revision, cavity number, and date. This level of traceability is essential for correlating any test failures back to the specific production batch. Ask for photos of the packed samples before shipment. Poor packaging that leads to scratched or deformed parts upon arrival wastes time and obscures true part quality. For moisture-sensitive materials like nylon, they should include desiccant and humidity indicator cards. This discipline in sample handling is a proxy for their overall process control and respect for the customer's timeline and requirements.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-6", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:34:24Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Rachel Huang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/rachel.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The sampling promise must align with their actual production scheduling reality. Ask how they prioritize sample runs: is there a dedicated cell or team, or does it compete with high-volume production? If it's the latter, your sample timeline is at high risk of being delayed. For low MOQ production, understand their batch scheduling strategy. Will they combine your 1,000-piece order with another customer's job in a similar material to optimize machine time? If so, how do they ensure material purity and prevent cross-contamination? Request a capacity plan for the months following sample approval to ensure they can ramp up if needed. A supplier that is overly eager to lock in a long lead time for production might be capacity-constrained, while one that promises immediate production slots may not have a stable order book.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-7", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:31:25Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/eric.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The sample approval should be governed by a clear Inspection Test Plan (ITP). Demand to see this plan before samples are made. It should define the inspection equipment (CMM, calipers, visual standards), the sampling size from the batch, and the specific dimensions to be measured on the FAI report. For cosmetic parts, a signed limit sample or digital photos with agreed lighting should be established. Ask about their internal quality checkpoints: is there an in-process check during sample molding (IPQC), and a final outgoing inspection (OQC)? How do they classify and document defects? A robust system will have a non-conformance report (NCR) for any deviation, even on samples. This rigor during sampling is the best predictor of consistent quality in mass production.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-8", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:29:49Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Amy Li","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/amy.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Treat the sampling phase as a mini-project. Evaluate their project management by requesting a clear milestone schedule: mold readiness, material arrival, first trial shot, inspection, and shipment. Identify a single point of contact who is responsible for communication and escalation. Crucially, establish a formal sample approval and change management process upfront. How are design changes requested and documented? What is the cost and timeline impact of a revision? A professional supplier will have a standard Engineering Change Request (ECR) form. Also, discuss the handoff from sampling to production: will the same team and process parameters be used? Clear protocols for issue resolution during sampling prevent confusion and delays later, ensuring a smoother transition to mass production.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/evaluate-supplier-sampling-moq-terms-injection-molding.html#suggestedAnswer-9", "datePublished": "2026-09-26T14:28:15Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/olivia.html"} } ] } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "China Sourcing Q&A >", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/china-sourcing/>"} ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "How to Evaluate Supplier Sampling and MOQ Terms for Injection Molding?"} ] } ] ```