---
title: "How to balance injection molding production mold cost and mass production service life?"
description: "Pushing new consumer goods OEM sample development and stuck evaluating injection molding production mold options, you get practical decision criteria to compare quotes, identify hidden risks, balance cost and service life, and eliminate common procurement pitfalls for smooth on-schedule mass production."
url: "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Injection Molding Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-09-12"
dateModified: "2026-09-12"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 10
---

# How to balance injection molding production mold cost and mass production service life?

## Question

 I’m a product development manager at a consumer goods company, pushing a new portable food storage container OEM sample that’s scheduled to launch in 6 months. We have 3 different mold quotes for the 2-cavity injection molding production mold for the container body right now, with price gaps as large as 42% between the lowest and highest bids. The lowest quote says they can deliver first T1 samples in 18 days, while the highest one quotes 35 days. I’m stuck right now: I don’t know which hidden cost or risk I might miss if I pick the lowest bid, what exact deliverables I should write into the formal contract to avoid rework later, and how to make sure the final mold can run 500,000 shots consistently for our peak holiday production without unexpected downtime. We don’t have extra budget for 2 rounds of mold modification, and any delay will push our whole launch timeline off the pre-booked sales window. 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

Your non-negotiable target of 500,000 shots, 2-cavity layout for the food contact container, and 6-month launch window sets the clear evaluation baseline, so comparing quotes solely on surface price will lead to unplanned losses down the line. The 42% price gap you observe almost always comes from 3 unstated areas that low bidders intentionally omit: proper hardened steel grade for cavity and core, full 5-axis precision machining instead of rough EDM post finishing, and standardized pre-delivery 48-hour continuous mold trial validation. Most low bidders use uncertified pre-hardened P20 steel that only guarantees 200,000 shots at maximum, and skip the critical mold base stress relief step, which causes uneven wear and random flash after 120,000 shots, forcing costly unplanned rework during your peak production period.

For lead time analysis, the 18-day T1 delivery claim from the lowest bidder is physically unfeasible for a 2-cavity thin-wall food container mold with required food-grade surface finish and proper venting design, unless they cut 3 to 4 critical processing steps. Normal full timeline breakdown for this type of mold is 3 days for DFM review, 7 days for mold base pre-machining, 10 days for cavity/core precision machining, 4 days for heat treatment and stress relief, 3 days for mold assembly, 3 days for first trial. Even if the tooling team works overtime every single day, the minimum feasible lead time is 30 days, so any bid under that threshold is a clear red flag that they will either delay delivery later or hand over a half-finished mold that needs multiple rounds of rework. **When comparing total project cost, calculate the sum of mold price, rework cost, 3 rounds of trial material cost, and potential sales window loss caused by 2 weeks of delay**, instead of only looking at the initial mold quote. For most consumer goods projects with tight launch windows, the hidden loss of a 10-day delay is at least 3 times the difference between the lowest and medium-level mold quote.

For supplier judgment, 3 actionable checks can filter unqualified bidders without extra third-party audit cost. First, request every supplier to provide the original steel mill certification report for cavity, core and mold base before you sign the contract, not just a verbal promise of material grade. Second, **add a clear penalty clause in the contract that 1% of total mold price will be deducted for every calendar day the T1 sample is delayed past the agreed date, and partial refund is required if the mold cannot reach 300,000 shots without unplanned repair**. Third, ask for their recent full mold trial video for similar thin-wall food container molds, and confirm they have documented the full stable process parameter window before sending samples. **Do not accept 50% full advance payment common for small workshops; the standard reasonable payment term for this type of mold is 40% deposit, 40% after T1 sample dimensional approval, 20% after full 48-hour continuous trial validation**. This structure locks most of the risk to the mold maker, and eliminates almost all unqualified suppliers that cannot meet your mass production requirements upfront.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Emily Chen
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 2

Check the DFM drawing feedback attached with each quote first, to see if the supplier has pointed out the hidden tooling risks of your current part design. For a thin-wall food storage container, if the original part design only has 0.5 degree of draft angle on the side wall, the mold will have to add expensive side actions to avoid scratch marks when demolding, which will push up the total cost. If no supplier mentions that, you will face 15% extra rework cost after the mold is finished, or you will get parts with obvious white scratch marks on the visible surface. All qualified quotes should have clear markups on wall thickness transitions, gate position and vent layout, and explain how they eliminate sink marks on the container bottom. Any quote that attaches no DFM review document is not worth further discussion no matter how low the price is.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 3

Evaluate if the finished mold can run stably on your existing injection machine and fit your downstream automation assembly line. If the mold layout has unbalanced cavity filling, you will get uneven part weight between two cavities, which will cause 2% more production scrap rate during mass production, and add 10% extra cycle time per shot. A well designed 2-cavity mold for 1L food container can reach 38 seconds cycle time, but a poorly built one can take 52 seconds, which reduces your daily output by 27% directly. You can ask each supplier to provide the estimated cycle time, and calculate how much extra labor, machine hour cost and output loss you will get for each 2 seconds of extra cycle time, then add that hidden cost to the initial mold quote for comparison.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 4

Lock down all inspection criteria for the finished mold before you confirm the order, so you have clear acceptance standard instead of subjective judgment after T1. The checkpoints should include: mold parting line flash tolerance below 0.01mm on the non-sealing surface, no ejector pin marks deeper than 0.02mm on the visible outer surface, cavity surface roughness reach Ra 0.2um for easy cleaning after production, and all cooling line pressure test pass at 10 bar without leakage. You also need to confirm that the supplier will provide full dimensional inspection report of 10 consecutive molded parts after T1 trial, and all dimensional deviation must be within your drawing tolerance range. Any supplier that refuses to list these inspection items in the acceptance document is highly likely to deliver a mold that cannot meet your quality requirements.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 5

Verify that the molded parts coming out of the mold will match your existing assembly and end use requirements, which is often ignored during mold development. For food storage containers, the sealing lip on the top edge needs to have consistent dimensional tolerance within ±0.03mm across every shot, otherwise the silicone lid will not form a proper airtight seal, leading to 15% product failure rate during consumer use. If the mold gate position is placed at the sealing lip area, it will leave a visible weld line that breaks the lip structure even after you trim the gate. You can cross check each supplier’s gate position design with your existing lid drawing, and confirm that the molded parts will pass your 1000 cycle opening and closing test before the mold starts mass production.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Rachel Huang
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 6

Check if the mold design has considered easy maintenance and long term yield stability, which helps you reduce long term production cost. For example, if all wearing inserts on the mold are designed as modular replaceable units, you can replace a worn insert in 1.5 hours during scheduled maintenance, instead of taking the whole mold offline for 3 days of rework. A properly designed mold for this application can keep mass production yield above 98.5% for the full 500,000 shot cycle, while a poorly built one will drop to 92% yield after 100,000 shots. The 6% gap in yield over 500,000 shots equals to 30,000 wasted parts, which costs more than 2 times the price difference between a good and low tier mold.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Amy Li
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 7

Check the exact steel source and hardness requirement listed in each quote, as this is the largest variable that causes the big price gap. Low tier quotes usually use no name local P20 steel with hardness around 28HRC, which will wear out quickly after 200,000 shots of molding food grade PP material with anti-block additive. Mid tier quotes use pre-hardened 718H steel with 33-37HRC, which can reach 500,000 shots easily. Top tier quotes use S136 stainless steel hardened to 48HRC, which can reach over 1 million shots but adds 30% cost. For your 500,000 shot requirement, 718H steel is the most cost effective option, you don’t need to pay extra for S136 unless you plan to run the same mold for 3 more years of follow up production. Ask for the original steel mill test report to make sure the supplier does not substitute lower grade material.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Linda Xu
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 8

Map every detailed project milestone to clear checkpoints with designated deliverables, so you can track progress weekly and catch delay risks early. The milestones should include: DFM review sign off within 3 days after deposit paid, mold design drawing approval within 7 days, rough machining finish notification at day 18, heat treatment finish notification at day 24, mold assembly finish notification at day 28, T1 sample delivery at day 32. Any supplier that cannot break down the project to these granular milestones will likely hide their internal delay until the final delivery date. You can arrange a 15 minute weekly sync call to confirm progress on each checkpoint, so you can adjust your downstream part validation and packaging material preparation timeline accordingly, no last minute rush to catch the launch window.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Eric Zhao
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 9

Check if the supplier will do a full process window validation before they hand over the finished mold, instead of just sending you samples that are produced at their own preferred machine settings. A good mold should have a wide stable process window, which means you can adjust melt temperature, injection speed and holding pressure within a reasonable range, and still get qualified parts without defects like warp, sink or flash. If the mold only can produce good parts at 2 specific parameter sets, it will be extremely hard for your on floor operators to run stably, leading to frequent unplanned downtime. All qualified suppliers will provide a full process parameter sheet with upper and lower limit for each setting, to help your team get the mold up and running on your own injection line in less than 4 hours after mold transfer.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Jason Zhou
**Date:** 2026-09-12

### Answer 10

Make sure the mold design is compatible with your selected food grade PP material grade, and leave enough adjustment space if you need to switch resin supplier later for cost optimization. If the mold gate size is designed too small, it will create excessive shear heat that degrades the PP resin, leading to weak impact strength of the final part even if you use virgin resin. If the cooling line layout is not optimized for the specific shrinkage rate of your selected PP grade, you will face unexpected warp that cannot be fixed even after 20 rounds of process adjustment. You can share the exact resin grade data sheet with each mold supplier early, and ask them to adjust gate size and cavity dimension shrinkage compensation accordingly, to avoid the situation that you have to rework the whole cavity later just because the shrinkage rate is not matched.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** David Zhang
**Date:** 2026-09-12

## Related Resources

- [Injection Molding Q&A](https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/injection-molding/)
- [Plastic Injection Molding](https://www.ok-tool.com/capabilities/plastic-injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Guide](https://www.ok-tool.com/manufacturing/injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Buying Guides](https://www.ok-tool.com/buying/injection-molding/)
- [Products](https://www.ok-tool.com/products/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.ok-tool.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/)
- [Injection Molding](https://www.ok-tool.com/knowledge/injection-molding/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How to balance injection molding production mold cost and mass production service life?",
        "text": "I’m a product development manager at a consumer goods company, pushing a new portable food storage container OEM sample that’s scheduled to launch in 6 months. We have 3 different mold quotes for the 2-cavity injection molding production mold for the container body right now, with price gaps as large as 42% between the lowest and highest bids. The lowest quote says they can deliver first T1 samples in 18 days, while the highest one quotes 35 days. I’m stuck right now: I don’t know which hidden cost or risk I might miss if I pick the lowest bid, what exact deliverables I should write into the formal contract to avoid rework later, and how to make sure the final mold can run 500,000 shots consistently for our peak holiday production without unexpected downtime. We don’t have extra budget for 2 rounds of mold modification, and any delay will push our whole launch timeline off the pre-booked sales window.",
        "answerCount": 10,
        "upvoteCount": 11,
        "datePublished": "2026-09-12T15:37:51Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-09-12T15:38:44Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Your non-negotiable target of 500,000 shots, 2-cavity layout for the food contact container, and 6-month launch window sets the clear evaluation baseline, so comparing quotes solely on surface price will lead to unplanned losses down the line. The 42% price gap you observe almost always comes from 3 unstated areas that low bidders intentionally omit: proper hardened steel grade for cavity and core, full 5-axis precision machining instead of rough EDM post finishing, and standardized pre-delivery 48-hour continuous mold trial validation. Most low bidders use uncertified pre-hardened P20 steel that only guarantees 200,000 shots at maximum, and skip the critical mold base stress relief step, which causes uneven wear and random flash after 120,000 shots, forcing costly unplanned rework during your peak production period. For lead time analysis, the 18-day T1 delivery claim from the lowest bidder is physically unfeasible for a 2-cavity thin-wall food container mold with required food-grade surface finish and proper venting design, unless they cut 3 to 4 critical processing steps. Normal full timeline breakdown for this type of mold is 3 days for DFM review, 7 days for mold base pre-machining, 10 days for cavity/core precision machining, 4 days for heat treatment and stress relief, 3 days for mold assembly, 3 days for first trial. Even if the tooling team works overtime every single day, the minimum feasible lead time is 30 days, so any bid under that threshold is a clear red flag that they will either delay delivery later or hand over a half-finished mold that needs multiple rounds of rework. When comparing total project cost, calculate the sum of mold price, rework cost, 3 rounds of trial material cost, and potential sales window loss caused by 2 weeks of delay , instead of only looking at the initial mold quote. For most consumer goods projects with tight launch windows, the hidden loss of a 10-day delay is at least 3 times the difference between the lowest and medium-level mold quote. For supplier judgment, 3 actionable checks can filter unqualified bidders without extra third-party audit cost. First, request every supplier to provide the original steel mill certification report for cavity, core and mold base before you sign the contract, not just a verbal promise of material grade. Second, add a clear penalty clause in the contract that 1% of total mold price will be deducted for every calendar day the T1 sample is delayed past the agreed date, and partial refund is required if the mold cannot reach 300,000 shots without unplanned repair . Third, ask for their recent full mold trial video for similar thin-wall food container molds, and confirm they have documented the full stable process parameter window before sending samples. Do not accept 50% full advance payment common for small workshops; the standard reasonable payment term for this type of mold is 40% deposit, 40% after T1 sample dimensional approval, 20% after full 48-hour continuous trial validation . This structure locks most of the risk to the mold maker, and eliminates almost all unqualified suppliers that cannot meet your mass production requirements upfront.",
            "upvoteCount": 11,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:39:24Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/emily.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Check the DFM drawing feedback attached with each quote first, to see if the supplier has pointed out the hidden tooling risks of your current part design. For a thin-wall food storage container, if the original part design only has 0.5 degree of draft angle on the side wall, the mold will have to add expensive side actions to avoid scratch marks when demolding, which will push up the total cost. If no supplier mentions that, you will face 15% extra rework cost after the mold is finished, or you will get parts with obvious white scratch marks on the visible surface. All qualified quotes should have clear markups on wall thickness transitions, gate position and vent layout, and explain how they eliminate sink marks on the container bottom. Any quote that attaches no DFM review document is not worth further discussion no matter how low the price is.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:38:38Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Evaluate if the finished mold can run stably on your existing injection machine and fit your downstream automation assembly line. If the mold layout has unbalanced cavity filling, you will get uneven part weight between two cavities, which will cause 2% more production scrap rate during mass production, and add 10% extra cycle time per shot. A well designed 2-cavity mold for 1L food container can reach 38 seconds cycle time, but a poorly built one can take 52 seconds, which reduces your daily output by 27% directly. You can ask each supplier to provide the estimated cycle time, and calculate how much extra labor, machine hour cost and output loss you will get for each 2 seconds of extra cycle time, then add that hidden cost to the initial mold quote for comparison.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:34:17Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/michael.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Lock down all inspection criteria for the finished mold before you confirm the order, so you have clear acceptance standard instead of subjective judgment after T1. The checkpoints should include: mold parting line flash tolerance below 0.01mm on the non-sealing surface, no ejector pin marks deeper than 0.02mm on the visible outer surface, cavity surface roughness reach Ra 0.2um for easy cleaning after production, and all cooling line pressure test pass at 10 bar without leakage. You also need to confirm that the supplier will provide full dimensional inspection report of 10 consecutive molded parts after T1 trial, and all dimensional deviation must be within your drawing tolerance range. Any supplier that refuses to list these inspection items in the acceptance document is highly likely to deliver a mold that cannot meet your quality requirements.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:31:28Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/sophia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Verify that the molded parts coming out of the mold will match your existing assembly and end use requirements, which is often ignored during mold development. For food storage containers, the sealing lip on the top edge needs to have consistent dimensional tolerance within ±0.03mm across every shot, otherwise the silicone lid will not form a proper airtight seal, leading to 15% product failure rate during consumer use. If the mold gate position is placed at the sealing lip area, it will leave a visible weld line that breaks the lip structure even after you trim the gate. You can cross check each supplier’s gate position design with your existing lid drawing, and confirm that the molded parts will pass your 1000 cycle opening and closing test before the mold starts mass production.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:17:06Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Rachel Huang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/rachel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Check if the mold design has considered easy maintenance and long term yield stability, which helps you reduce long term production cost. For example, if all wearing inserts on the mold are designed as modular replaceable units, you can replace a worn insert in 1.5 hours during scheduled maintenance, instead of taking the whole mold offline for 3 days of rework. A properly designed mold for this application can keep mass production yield above 98.5% for the full 500,000 shot cycle, while a poorly built one will drop to 92% yield after 100,000 shots. The 6% gap in yield over 500,000 shots equals to 30,000 wasted parts, which costs more than 2 times the price difference between a good and low tier mold.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:13:55Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Amy Li","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/amy.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Check the exact steel source and hardness requirement listed in each quote, as this is the largest variable that causes the big price gap. Low tier quotes usually use no name local P20 steel with hardness around 28HRC, which will wear out quickly after 200,000 shots of molding food grade PP material with anti-block additive. Mid tier quotes use pre-hardened 718H steel with 33-37HRC, which can reach 500,000 shots easily. Top tier quotes use S136 stainless steel hardened to 48HRC, which can reach over 1 million shots but adds 30% cost. For your 500,000 shot requirement, 718H steel is the most cost effective option, you don’t need to pay extra for S136 unless you plan to run the same mold for 3 more years of follow up production. Ask for the original steel mill test report to make sure the supplier does not substitute lower grade material.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:12:53Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/linda.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Map every detailed project milestone to clear checkpoints with designated deliverables, so you can track progress weekly and catch delay risks early. The milestones should include: DFM review sign off within 3 days after deposit paid, mold design drawing approval within 7 days, rough machining finish notification at day 18, heat treatment finish notification at day 24, mold assembly finish notification at day 28, T1 sample delivery at day 32. Any supplier that cannot break down the project to these granular milestones will likely hide their internal delay until the final delivery date. You can arrange a 15 minute weekly sync call to confirm progress on each checkpoint, so you can adjust your downstream part validation and packaging material preparation timeline accordingly, no last minute rush to catch the launch window.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T16:11:25Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/eric.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Check if the supplier will do a full process window validation before they hand over the finished mold, instead of just sending you samples that are produced at their own preferred machine settings. A good mold should have a wide stable process window, which means you can adjust melt temperature, injection speed and holding pressure within a reasonable range, and still get qualified parts without defects like warp, sink or flash. If the mold only can produce good parts at 2 specific parameter sets, it will be extremely hard for your on floor operators to run stably, leading to frequent unplanned downtime. All qualified suppliers will provide a full process parameter sheet with upper and lower limit for each setting, to help your team get the mold up and running on your own injection line in less than 4 hours after mold transfer.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-9",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T15:50:57Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/jason.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Make sure the mold design is compatible with your selected food grade PP material grade, and leave enough adjustment space if you need to switch resin supplier later for cost optimization. If the mold gate size is designed too small, it will create excessive shear heat that degrades the PP resin, leading to weak impact strength of the final part even if you use virgin resin. If the cooling line layout is not optimized for the specific shrinkage rate of your selected PP grade, you will face unexpected warp that cannot be fixed even after 20 rounds of process adjustment. You can share the exact resin grade data sheet with each mold supplier early, and ask them to adjust gate size and cavity dimension shrinkage compensation accordingly, to avoid the situation that you have to rework the whole cavity later just because the shrinkage rate is not matched.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/balance-injection-molding-production-mold-cost-mass-production-service-life.html#suggestedAnswer-10",
            "datePublished": "2026-09-12T15:38:44Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "David Zhang","url": "https://www.ok-tool.com/team/david.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Injection Molding Q&A >", "item": "https://www.ok-tool.com/qa/injection-molding/<small>></small>"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "How to balance injection molding production mold cost and mass production service life?"}
      ]
    }
]
```